Super Agents are not super
Andrew Fair
I tried one of the default agents that were an example, scan my entire workspace and look for any Spaces, Folders, or List with no activity/tasks for the last 60 days and give me a list of recommendations for being archived.
3 Times I updated it after it's initialy setup, 3 times I told it explicitly to not give me already archived folders/lists to me to recommend me archive them. Although by the 3rd time it gave me less, it still gave me many archived lists and folders. Including many lists that were inside an archived folder.
To say the least I'm very unimpressed with the reasoning it has. Is this on gpt-4? Because if it is that makes a lot of sense, the way it talks, and processes info lacks any checking. It apologizes like it's gpt-4, it straight up hallucinates in the same message it sends you. For instance on my 2nd try it finished the message with
What I deliberately excluded
Archived or previously archived Spaces/Folders/Lists are completely ignored by design.
This is at the end of a message where the list of "Strong cleanup candidates" was literally ALL already archived lists.
I'm sorry, but if it can't even follow a simple instruction of "no archived folders" and can't even reason enough on it's own to not recommend me to archive an already archived folder it's not reliable to be used for anything else.
I truly hope you didn't go through all the effort to make these on a very outdated AI model.
Btw here is it's excuse - which basically just said "I didn't even consider I'm supposed to be looking for non-archived locations" and just went with my first search and never even checked my own behavior to see if I was doing it right. Which screams to me gpt-4
[[It's excuse]]
What went wrong:
In the first pass I relied on list activity dates and hierarchy, but I didn’t strictly enforce an “only non‑archived locations” check before adding a list to the recommendations.
Because of that, archived sprint boards (like the [Folder > List] sprints you listed) slipped into the “cleanup candidates” section even though my own rules say to exclude anything archived or previously archived.
Log In